Decide on the candidate without becoming a case-file analyst
The background check step usually lands at the end of the funnel, when the team has already invested time and the candidate is in a hurry. InCheck delivers the result already interpreted, so the decision doesn't depend on legal reading.
A bad hire costs twice: first in severance and lost time, then in the legal and reputational risk of associating the company with someone whose history doesn't fit the role. Manual, court-by-court checking doesn't scale with hiring volume.
How InCheck solves it
InCheck consolidates criminal certificates and cases linked to the candidate into a single report, with the person's role in the case already correctly classified (defendant, victim, or witness), so HR doesn't need to interpret raw case filings to make a decision.
The person's role in the case
Defendant, victim, or witness completely change the meaning of the same result. The classification comes from the case's party data, not an isolated term.
Summary in plain language
What the case is about, without jargon and without introducing information that isn't in the original document.
Flagged risk category
What within the case content deserves attention, always traceable back to the excerpt that triggered the flag.
How this plays out in your flow
Select the stage to see what happens at each moment of the verification.
Provide the data once
The candidate's CPF and name are enough to start. The platform validates the data before creating the verification and accepts individual or batch requests.
The checks behind this use case
The checks that make up the verification described above.
Want to see how InCheck fits into your process?
Talk to our sales team and see what makes sense for your operation.