Know not just that a case exists, but what it actually means
From the person's CPF and name, we locate criminal cases in public sources and return a report per case, with the person's role already classified, a plain-language summary, and risk flagged by category.
Manually checking criminal cases is slow and expensive to scale. And name matches create false positives: the same person can appear in a case as a defendant, victim, witness, or attorney, and that changes everything.
Every step, traceable to the source
The Criminal Record Check automates the search and risk assignment, without requiring anyone to interpret raw case filings.
Role classified, not assumed
Terms like "appellant" can mean opposite things depending on who filed the appeal. We cross-check each term against the case's party data before classifying it, and flag it as undetermined, for manual review, when there isn't enough certainty.
Summary faithful to the case
The summary never adds information that isn't in the original case file. That's a product acceptance criterion, and a public promise.
Risk flagged by category
The engine identifies dozens of risk categories in the case content, always traceable back to the source excerpt, and used to build this check's risk level (High, Medium, Low, or No risk), with the cutoff criteria configurable by each company, not a closed score we impose.
Where the data comes from
We check state and federal courts and national public databases. Coverage is constantly expanding; technical details of each integration aren't disclosed publicly.
- Full coverage
- Partial coverage
- Not yet covered
How clients use this check
Frequently asked questions
If your question isn't here, talk to the team. We answer without the runaround.
No. The Criminal Record Check returns a risk level (High, Medium, Low, or No risk) for the findings. The person's final status (Approved, Alert, or Rejected) is the combined result of every check that makes up the verification, with the criteria configurable by your company's business rules.
The role is classified from the case's party data, never from an isolated term. Ambiguous cases are flagged for manual review instead of assumed.
State and federal courts, plus national public databases, with coverage expanding. We don't disclose the full technical list of integrations.